Rittenhouse has since turned 18 years old is an adult for all intents and purposes - except in Schroeder’s courtroom.Įarlier this year, Schroeder extended more sympathetic treatment to Rittenhouse that defy legal standards by inexplicably ruling that the teenager did not violate the terms of his bond by concealing his address from the court. Schroeder said he typically makes the court refer to adults by their last name. Schroeder also ruled during that same hearing that only the defense can refer to Rittenhouse by his first name during the trial. Reacting to Rittenhouse breaking down crying and the court calling a subsequent recess, NewsOne’s Zack Linly described the histrionics as a “D-list-level dry-blubbering performance.” Linly was far from alone in that sentiment.ĭuring the final court hearing before the trial began, Schroeder ruled the people who Rittenhouse gunned down in a street can’t be referred to as “victims.” However, Schroeder did allow the two deceased men to be “referred to as rioters, looters or arsonists or other pejorative terms,” the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported at the time. Even though he was heavily armed with an assault rifle, Rittenhouse testified under oath that he “was never trying to kill” anyone. Rittenhouse took the stand to testify in his own defense last week during which he openly cried on the stand, prompting critics to suggest he produced the type of crocodile tears that could sway a jury to take a more merciful approach to returning a verdict for a white teenager, in particular. By bringing that gun, aiming it at people, threatening people’s lives, the defendant provoked everything.”īinger explained that self-defense requires Rittenhouse to do more than turn and shoot as a first response.Ĭonversely, Rittenhouse’s lawyers in their closing arguments alleged a rush to judgment in the case and suggested the police may have been under pressure to arrest the teenager after his deadly shooting spree. “I f you created the danger, you forfeit the right to self-defense. “You cannot hide behind self-defense if you provoked the incident,” Binger said during the prosecution’s closing. Rejecting the idea that Rittenhouse feared for his life or had to act in self-defense, Binger walked through the various reckless decisions taken by the young gunman. In an effort to pierce the veil of so-called reasonable white fear, Kenosha County Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger framed Rittenhouse’s actions as those of a provocateur instigating violence. Here’s a glimpse of some of the more pivotal moments in Rittenhojse’s murder trial. Rittenhouse was facing a sentence of life in prison before the verdict was delivered. ![]() 26, 2020, and ultimately charged with five felony counts and one misdemeanor: first-degree reckless homicide for killing Rosenbaum first-degree recklessly endangering safety for firing his gun toward two people, including Richard McGiniss, who testified as a witness at the trial first-degree intentional homicide for killing Huber attempted first-degree homicide for shooting Grosskreutz use of a dangerous weapon and the misdemeanor of possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18. Rittenhouse, who has been described as a “wannabe cop,” has maintained his innocence and claims he was ambushed. 25, 2020, when he killed Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, of Kenosha, and Anthony Huber, 26, of Silver Lake, Wisconsin, and shot Gaige Grosskreutz, now 27, of West Allis, Wisconsin, the sole survivor from the vigilante shootings.Īll three have been described as activists in their own rights who joined in the demonstrations against local police for shooting Jacob Blake seven times at close range in the back, paralyzing the unarmed Black man from the waist down two days before Rittenhouse, who traveled to Kenosha from his native Illinois, unleashed his shooting spree on Grosskreutz, Huber and Rosenbaum. The case revolved around a fine blend of white vigilantism, legal double standards along racial lines when it comes to self-defense and an apparent referendum on racial justice protests as critics connected the sympathetic dots of Rittenhouse’s lenient treatment by the criminal justice system since the fateful night of Aug. ![]() 7 Years After Tamir Rice’s Killing, Samaria Rice Calls Kyle Rittenhouse’s Not Guilty Verdict ‘Pitiful’ĭefense attorneys argued multiple motions for acquittal throughout the trial, including an 11th-hour attempt after closing arguments based on allegations the prosecution withheld drone footage of the shootings Kenosha shootings from the defense.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |